NCEA 1.5 Formal Writing : Ambition in Macbeth

In 1606, a new play by the legendary playwright Shakespeare was first performed in his Globe Theatre, London. The new tragedy, titled ‘Macbeth’, allowed the audience to gain a unique insight into the terrible and dire consequences of unrestrained ambition. Shakespeare gave us this insight with a masterful use of dramatic devices throughout the entire play such as dramatic irony, and language effects like soliloquy and metaphors, and created a new world for the audience to enter.

Macbeth’s mind is clear and filled with noble thoughts, but he has a small flaw in his thinking. The protagonist, and arguably the antagonist of the play, Macbeth, is presented in the beginning as a brave, noble and courageous hero, that fought loyally for his king. But we are soon shown by Shakespeare that every man has a flaw, including Macbeth, and his ambition. The predictions he receives from the witches stirs this ambition, and causes Macbeth to be obsessed with the idea that he had been told by the witches, of becoming king. In Macbeth’s first soliloquy Shakespeare says “My thought, whose murder yet is but fantastical, Shakes so my single state of man, that function Is smothered in surmise, and nothing is, But what is not.” Macbeth is saying that he may have to murder the king to become it, and that the very thought is poisoning his mind. However, it is interesting that his mind jumped right to the thought of murder, showing us the wickedness that might be dormant in Macbeth’s mind, ready to be awakened. He goes on to say, “If Chance will have me king, why, Chance may crown me, Without my stir.” He is essentially contradicting himself, saying that he will become king regardless of his actions, but put into context with his previous statements, it seems as if this is less of an idea but more of an excuse, trying to rid his mind of his treasonous thoughts. This soliloquy is a good example of dramatic irony, when the audience knows something that most or all of the characters do not. This is used to give the audience better ideas of the events happening, and the causes. Shakespeare uses dramatic irony in this case to show us the mind of Macbeth, and show what flaws he may have. Macbeth is already becoming conflicted by his ambition to become king, and Shakespeare has shown us this through his use of soliloquy and dramatic irony.

Macbeth is becoming much more willing to do terrible deeds to become the king, and this is shown during Act 2 Scene 1 of the play, where Shakespeare reveals this with the creation of an apparition. A bloody dagger appears in front of Macbeth, but it is not determined whether it is a true supernatural appearance or “but A dagger of the mind, a false creation”. This dagger appears at a very specific moment, when Macbeth is thinking about the possible murder of Duncan. This apparition has been formed by Macbeth’s unstable mind, and he speaks to the dagger as if it were a sentient being. This shows Macbeth’s unsurety about murdering the king, and is now desperately scrambling to make excuses and justifications for the murder. With this desperation is the creation of this ‘sentient dagger’, and Macbeth then goes on to blame the dagger for the treasonous thoughts, and make it appear as if the dagger is forcing him to kill Duncan, rather than Macbeth do it of his own will. Macbeth then says, “Thou marshell’st me the way that I was going”, saying that the dagger is controlling Macbeth’s actions and telling Macbeth to perform the murder. The fact the he is trying to make excuses portrays Macbeth, ironically, as a weak minded coward, a stark contrast to the hero in the beginning. However, Macbeth believes this justification is enough, and the upcoming murder of Duncan now seems inevitable. This scene show how Macbeth is becoming more unstable, and wants to perform evils actions but still needs justification to do it. His ambition is quickly becoming a doorway for his wickedness to come through and reveal itself.

Macbeth’s mind is becoming increasingly degenerate, and Shakespeare gives us an insight to this degeneration of his mind by ambition in Act 3 Scene 4. After the killing of Duncan, he was deeply affected, carrying massive guilt of his actions. He is left broken and uncertain of his next actions, while his ever increasing ambition is goading him onward. The successful murder of Duncan, however, makes Macbeth believe that these evil and dark actions that he performs, although immoral, will always work. This thought, along with his ambition, twists Macbeth’s mind into believing he must do whatever it takes to stay as king. Shakespeare says, “I am in blood Stepped in so far, that, should I wade no more, Returning were as tedious as go o’er.” This quote shows how Macbeth believes he is too deep in his river of guilt, and that going back will be no better than going forward. This is obviously untrue, as going back would save a lot of death, pain and suffering of the people of Scotland, but Macbeth’s corrupt and selfish mind is convinced that the best path for him to take is the one going forward. This is a big turning point for the behavior and upcoming actions of Macbeth, as he now is convinced that he must go ahead and commit to all necessary actions, good or evil, to stay as king. This belief shows his almost complete loss of humanity and morality. This change of mind was the final push that set his wickedness loose, and it is now shown to everyone. The degeneration of Macbeth’s mind is apparent with his flawed ideas, caused by his ambition.

The degeneration of Macbeth’s mind is complete after the sudden suicide of Lady Macbeth, a clear consequence of the savage ambition within Macbeth. Macbeth is now but a shadow of his glorious past, having nothing to live for. He then says, “To the last syllable of recorded time”. This metaphor shows us the deep pit of despair and hopelessness that he is now in, but it also tells us something more. This is actually Shakespeare talking to his audience through Macbeth, and this can be identified by the specific use of the words in this quote. A syllable is a measurement of time for a play, which ironically he is a character in. Macbeth cannot know that he is in a play, so it is Shakespeare using the character to connect to the audience. He is saying how all plays will end, and that this play is nearing it’s end. He goes on to say, “a poor player That struts and frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more”. Shakespeare is telling us that as the play ends, so does the story and all it’s characters. This again is a metaphor comparing his life to a play, which he is a part of. Because this is a line from Macbeth, its almost as if he is subconsciously aware that his life is nearing it’s end, which only adds to his already consuming despair. This metaphor also relates to all humans, and the despair they would feel if they were certain of the upcoming death. Macbeth’s mind has been consumed and destroyed by his blinding ambition, and the wicked consequences of his actions.

Shakespeare’s use of literary devices in specific places has added great depth and additional meaning to his texts, and better aids the communication of his ideas. The degeneration of Macbeth’s mind by his ambition is shown throughout the play, and use of literary devices such as dramatic irony connect parts of the play together, and creates a world that the reader can immerse themselves in. The use of soliloquy allow us to enter the world and Macbeth’s mind in a special and insightful way, and use of metaphors to connect the fictional with the real world, and the reader. This tragedy, along with Shakespeare’s other plays, have shown us a new psychological understanding into the way of the human mind. Shakespeare’s texts have been renowned pieces of literature for centuries, by his powerful use of literary devices to enhance the stories he creates.

NCEA 1.5 Formal Writing – Spoken Language Study

Text messaging has experienced a huge boom in popularity and in 2019 alone, more than 8 trillion text messages were sent. That is equal to 270,000 text messages per second! Because of the massive amounts of texts sent every day, people, mainly the younger generation have revolutionized the way we write and has made the texting language more in common with speech than with the standard writing language. People have introduced many features to make texting more akin to speech such as devices for para-linguistic features, using slang and very informal language, and often use omission. All these are features from or related to speech that has been brought into text messaging and makes texting very similar to speech. Text messaging is also instantaneous, making these verbal features effective in the writing of a text.

With the introduction of the instantaneous direct messaging that we call texting, people felt the need to convey their emotions through text messages, a feature commonly used in verbal conversations with gestures, tone and facial expression. In 1999, the first Emoji was created for the purpose of being able to express emotion through a small image. This was a very effective and popular way for people to show emotions in texting and is very common in current-day texting, as recent statistics show that 5 billion emojis are sent daily on Facebook Messenger. One of the most commonly used Emoji is the ‘?’ emoji or the Face With Tears Of Joy emoji. This emoji is used to express the emotion of laughter or happiness. It is a substitute for laughing in a face to face verbal conversation. This image is hyperbole, as it is unlikely that the sender of the Emoji is literally laughing with tears of joy, but it still indicates humour that is in the text. It also helps give the receiver an idea of what the tone of the writing is like. If a text is sent with the ‘?’ emoji in it, it means that the sender of the text is joking and the tone of the writing is light and happy. Emoji are a very effective way to convey emotion in writing and would be used frequently in the 23 billion text messages sent every day.

With the intention of making text and speech homogeneous, informal language and slang became very common in texting. Informal language is used very often in verbal conversations when the participants are intimate and relaxed or have a relationship with the other. It creates a connection between the participants and sends the message of friendship. Informal language is also common in text messages and is used in much the same way it is used in speech. However, the informal language will never occur in standard English writing, such as letters and documents. Slang is also common in text messaging and speech, as it can communicate ideas quicker than formally describing it. ‘Why na I’m about to head off rn. Putting my kicks on.’ This is a very good example of very informal language and slang commonly used in text messaging. It can be inferred with the language used that the participants of the text conversation have some relationship and are very relaxed in the presence of each other. The formalized version of this text would be: ‘No because I am about to leave shortly. I am currently putting my shoes on.’ This is very different from the text and would be used in very formal occasions. In most texts, informal language is used as texting imitates a normal conversation, so the language and slang would come into it. As most texts are sent to people that have a relationship with the sender, informal language is found very often in the huge number of text sent each day.

There is a large amount of omission that can be found in nearly all of the 8 trillion text messages sent. In texting, it is very common to find omission in the messages, usually, basic words such as ‘the’ and ‘or’, but can be parts of sentences that are not needed. This is because omission of words makes it much faster for the sender to write the text and send it. Because text messaging is instantaneous, the reader will get the text as soon as it is sent. However, there is still the delay of writing that text. People have started omitting words to make the text conversation more like a verbal one because verbal conversations are instant. Omitting words is a very effective way of making the text message faster, but still make the text understandable. In the text ‘Biking?’, there is a large amount of omission in it. Most of the question has been taken out, but to the receiver of the text, it is still understandable. The question is also asked often so the receiver knows the question well and can respond to just one word. The full question is ‘Are you going to bike to school today?’ It can now be inferred that the two participants of this text conversation bike to school regularly, and the same question has come up many times. When the receiver gets the text they know the full question, and only need a word to remember it. Text messaging is a very regular thing for many people, as shown in the number of texts sent. The text ‘Biking?’ is far quicker and easier to type than the full question, and makes the conversation near-instantaneous. Omission has helped text messaging become quicker and more efficient making it similar to a spoken conversation.

Text messaging has dramatically changed since the first text and has become more and more akin to the spoken language than the formal written language. Emojis have been invented to aid the expression of emotion and tone to a text. Slang and informal language are used often in texts, imitating a spoken conversation. Omission is used to make texting efficient and more instantaneous like speech, removing unnecessary parts. These spoken language features that have been brought into the text language make texting very similar to the spoken language and less like the formal written language.

This is your online portfolio

Hello and welcome to your personal online journal.

This platform has been created to enhance and enrich your learning at Mount Aspiring College. Its purpose is to provide you with an audience for your work (or work-in-progress) and you have the choice (by altering the ‘visibility’ of your posts) of whether your work on here is visible to the world, or only to your teacher.

Anything you post here in the public domain represents you and thus it’s important that you take care with that decision, but don’t be afraid to publish your work – as the feedback you may get from people at home, your peers and people from around the internet is only likely to enhance it.

Remember you can always access your class blog and all manner of resources through the Department of English main website – and by all means check out the sites of your peers to see what they’re getting up to as well.

If you have any questions for me, an excellent way to get an answer is to create a new private post on this journal. I am notified of any new posts and will reply swiftly to any queries.

Make the most of, and enjoy this new freedom in your English learning.

Righto!

Chris Waugh